-
Website
http://www.jimkukral.com -
Original page
http://www.jimkukral.com/youtube-should-have-dumped-perez-hilton-a-long-time-ago/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
RuthannDisotell
5 comments · 1 points
-
templestark
4 comments · 4 points
-
grantgriffiths
5 comments · 2 points
-
GeekMommy
5 comments · 16 points
-
lisamariemary
13 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Guest Posts Wanted
3 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
Guest Posts Wanted
That said, he was in the wrong here.
Like everybody else. he didn't read the terms. But he had to know he was using protected material without permission.
He does have a point that they should send notices to their internal mail system, too.
I get false positives in my spam folder all the time.
No, it says he "received" $5k.
According to this: http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answe...
it takes 2 months until you get paid.
So, those $5k must be for the first of three months.
If we divide 25 million video views by 3, we get ~ 8.3 million views.
So, IF he generated 8.3M views in the first month
and Youtube/Google paid him $5k for that,
then it would mean a payout of $0.60 per thousand views.
And according to this:
http://www.webvideoreport.com/case_studies/2007...
"Companies wanting to advertise on YouTube for less can sign up for Google AdWords for as little as a $1 CPM."
IF that is correct, and Youtube generates only $1 per thousand views,
then $0.60 payout is OK.
As for YouTube, the quality of video compression they have will never lend itself to higher quality videos. I think the business folks are flocking to Kyte, Blip and the like.
Blip for business? If you read their terms, it says no professional content. In fact, one group I'm associated with recently had their account suspended for uploading high-quality business videos. I need to post about that. Ridiculous.
My only complaint against youtube is that, they should have stood against copyrighted videos being uploaded right from the begining.