<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jim Kukral - Latest Comments in The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://jimkukral.disqus.com/</link><description>Web marketing podcasts</description><atom:link href="https://jimkukral.disqus.com/the_death_of_the_a_list_93/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:12:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-970519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish you were right... I really do&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noah David Simon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:12:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-938885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Until a single so-called A-lister becomes anything more than a Z-lister in the real world - I mean, really, as others have said, even within the Internet itself most of these people are complete unknowns to the majority of everyday folk - I'm not sure anything of this really matters, does it? I can't think of a single blogger who is famous outside of the blogosphere. Even Kevin Rose is a complete nobody to the non-Digg user. David Spade owns him. Heck, Freddie Prinze Jr owns him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Relatively, we're talking 'A-list' inside a very small bowl.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shéamus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:06:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-883589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stupid question of the day. You are claiming the A-list is dead because of twitter, friendfeed and co, yet all the stats I see on twitter usage show power laws. Which to me imply the continued existence of an A-list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whether the a-list still includes calcanis and scoble I have no idea. In fact, I unfollowed scoble because he made lots of twitter noise that i couldn't be bothered keeping up with. His breathless excitement was off putting. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DomesticMouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:12:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-883395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank for such a wonderful idea.really thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amirulcyber</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:41:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-882774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post and so true. The numbers game is getting kinda weak - time to put up or move aside.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And btw - that picture is going to scar me for the rest of my life.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sonny Gill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:43:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-882258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man you did a very good job of putting it in perspective.&lt;br&gt;Paul&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulmccord</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:06:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-881357</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shawn, tacky and entitled is SOOO true.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wil reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:13:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-880767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about the concept of the A-list now being supported by the media?  Mike Arrington remains large because he jumps on TV every so often.  Maybe the A-list isn't as strongly defined as it used to be, but I still think getting on CNBC is a milestone that separates you from those who haven't been on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Kepler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:42:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-880541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure I consider myself a geek, just an accountant who has an interest and aptitude for technology more than the average CPA.  I heard about this post from Twitter, which all of my accounting readers are scared to death of.  Except the ones at the beginning of their careers (and a few other hybrids like me.)  The 20-somethings are into everything , 24/7, and don't  call it "social media."  It just is. And they don't wait for permission from anyone to reach out or to give their opinion.  I like that and they push and pull me to to do what I've always done, network, only using new tools.  Scoble, Calacanis, Arrington? Might as well be Rocky and Bullwinkle to me and to the 20-somethings.  As obscure as those cartoon characters except for the fact sometimes they show up and assume everyone is going to be entertained.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fmckenna</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:57:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-880072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, great point Brian. Tech used to "be" blogging mainstream, you're right. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-880041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post there..&lt;br&gt;This is what i agree with entirely -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The a-list died because we’re tired of them and their incessant drama and posturing for attention. We all just decided enough was enough and called bullshit. It was bound to happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chetan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:15:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-879858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post Jim. I think the one point you don't address is that tech used to = blogging. Now it doesn't (not even close), but the tech guys don't realize that most people could care less about geekery... blogging is not about technology, it's about people. The more "normal" the blogging demographic looks, the less relevant the nerd herd.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Clark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:36:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-879337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely fair game, and very funny. I had the opportunity to get to know Shel at the SNCR New Communications Forum in California in April. He and I are both Senior Fellows of SNCR, so it was nice to meet in a peer setting. He's quirky, snarky, and very funny. Don't know Scoble, but he's made a very successful brand of himself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PodcastSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:43:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-879277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Select blog stars will become much larger and morph into global columnists. Makes me think of HuffPo, that's not even a blog anymore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some bloggers will always post 10x a day, the usefulness of this schedule will become less important to most readers. Think NYT op-ed page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People love the quickness of blogs, but I would does that help them do you job better or become more efficient or make more money? Not for the majority of readers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe I'm too focused on the post-anytime nature of blogs today, but still, I'd rather read and write longer though pieces than 150 words several times a day. Still, I think today's A-listers are brealy breaking the surface. Just wait until blog translation services start to emerge and China is reading you. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daveevans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:30:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;GREAT points Shawn.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:59:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, people are still paying attention to guys like Scoble. There's nothing wrong with that. I follow him and I like reading his thoughts My point was that "his kind" is not needed as much anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:58:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But will these new stars be as big as the old stars were? I don't think we'll duplicate what happened once do to the reasons I stated above.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:56:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's pretty much what I alluded to in my piece Mark, we agree.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:53:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I thought about not using it Steve, but there it was in the #3 google images result for Scoble. I figured it was fair game?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:51:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL. How prophetic! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:50:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points Mack.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:49:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree - the social network and the ease of the tools gives everyone the opportunity to make their point "pimp" their blog and have their say. The mere fact that I came to this via a "re Plurk" makes the point entirely. Welcome to the new age - but please learn the etiquette. That is the message - despite what we think there are rules and if broken like any form of communication you will be excluded.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JimBob51</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:48:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;excellent - the d-list is the new A-ist ;-) shades of but for a typo in the original, "the geek shall inherit the earth."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">templestark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:17:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878260</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a little black and white but I like Steve's answer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">templestark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:14:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of The A-list</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/the-death-of-the-a-list/#comment-878245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True,as social media has changed, the present 'A listers' have failed to change with it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's probably a natural arrogance that tends to go with being on an A list of any sort, but if those on it don't learn to flow with the tide, they go the way of the dinosaur! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ozegold</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:09:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>