<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jim Kukral - Latest Comments in Social Networks Killed The A-List?</title><link>http://jimkukral.disqus.com/</link><description>Web marketing podcasts</description><atom:link href="https://jimkukral.disqus.com/social_networks_killed_the_a_list/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:33:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social Networks Killed The A-List?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/social-networks-killed-the-a-list/#comment-4780872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, I get that, but still, you have to build those networks over time, you don't just get a million friends automatically, and even if it posts to the web, it's not read massively either..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still contend the biggest bonus of an "A-list" mention is the eyeballs they can bring to the masses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Killed The A-List?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/social-networks-killed-the-a-list/#comment-4780871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You forgot that Twitter and Pownce post to the Web. The Web includes Google. Google brings traffic. So, I disagree with your penultimate paragraph. Posting to Twitter can bring a lot more than just your immediate friends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 04:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>