<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jim Kukral - Latest Comments in Just Kill The PayPerPost Brand &amp;#038; Focus On SocialSpark</title><link>http://jimkukral.disqus.com/</link><description>Web marketing podcasts</description><atom:link href="https://jimkukral.disqus.com/just_kill_the_payperpost_brand_038_focus_on_socialspark/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:13:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Just Kill The PayPerPost Brand &amp;#038; Focus On SocialSpark</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/just-kill-the-payperpost-brand-focus-on-socialspark/#comment-4781490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google wouldn't penalize socialspark users/advertisers because the links are all nofollow so search engines like google won't be giving weight/pagerank to those links.  socialspark also requires you to have a disclosure on the individual post indicating that it is sponsored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I had started using ppp then switched to socialspark.. i only posted one article for ppp but my pagerank has dropped 2pts in the last 6 months.. I stopped using ppp thinking it may have contributed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;dans last blog post..&lt;a href="http://serial-box.net/2008/10/04/canadians-can-watch-hulucom/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://serial-box.net/2008/10/04/canadians-can-watch-hulucom/"&gt;Canadians Can Watch Hulu.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:13:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Kill The PayPerPost Brand &amp;#038; Focus On SocialSpark</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/just-kill-the-payperpost-brand-focus-on-socialspark/#comment-4781484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So how can you be so sure that Google won't penalize SocialSpark's blogs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Michael Aulia's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MichaelAulia/~3/279282947/prevent-someone-from-stealing-your-bandwith-the-easy-way.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MichaelAulia/~3/279282947/prevent-someone-from-stealing-your-bandwith-the-easy-way.html"&gt;Prevent someone from stealing your bandwith, the easy way&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Aulia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:42:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Kill The PayPerPost Brand &amp;#038; Focus On SocialSpark</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/just-kill-the-payperpost-brand-focus-on-socialspark/#comment-4781485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that payperpost is dead.  A part of me completely agrees with Google penalizing paying for links.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google created this artificial market where people were paying inflated prices just to increase their pagerank.  That never made much sense to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't get me wrong.  I am disappointed that my blogging career started too late to profit from it, but I can't be mad at Google for ending the madness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred @ Newest on the Net</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:30:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Kill The PayPerPost Brand &amp;#038; Focus On SocialSpark</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/just-kill-the-payperpost-brand-focus-on-socialspark/#comment-4781487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm curious to know what percent of sales were influenced by SEO and how that will impact SocialSpark.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Rodriguez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:03:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Kill The PayPerPost Brand &amp;#038; Focus On SocialSpark</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/just-kill-the-payperpost-brand-focus-on-socialspark/#comment-4781486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you are probably right. i think they might be forced to kill off the payperpost brand. My guess is that they will do it however they need to handle it in the right way - ie. so that payperpost users migrate to their new network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm eager to get a look at socialspark - from the screenshots etc you've posted it looks like an interesting concept.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Muldoon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:01:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Kill The PayPerPost Brand &amp;#038; Focus On SocialSpark</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/just-kill-the-payperpost-brand-focus-on-socialspark/#comment-4781489</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yea...Google's going to be big no matter what happens and no matter how many of us leave the services it provides.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Huang</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:50:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Kill The PayPerPost Brand &amp;#038; Focus On SocialSpark</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/just-kill-the-payperpost-brand-focus-on-socialspark/#comment-4781488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jim&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem is I have been given a penalty for writing posts that conform to what will be possible with SocialSpark.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nofollow is only necessary with SocialSpark for advertiser specified links, and mine are editorial, just like Techcrunch class their post with 8 links and absolutely no content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That post on Techcrunch is really blatant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>