<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jim Kukral - Latest Comments in Help Jim&amp;#8230; Get His Fatblogging Domain Back!</title><link>http://jimkukral.disqus.com/</link><description>Web marketing podcasts</description><atom:link href="https://jimkukral.disqus.com/help_jim8230_get_his_fatblogging_domain_back/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:22:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Help Jim&amp;#8230; Get His Fatblogging Domain Back!</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/help-jim-get-his-fatblogging-domain-back/#comment-4780546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jim:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GoDaddy is notorious for stealing domains. If you look at their site, they have a place where you can bid on them. When a name expires, within minutes sometimes the harvesters of domain names snatch it all up.  Then they want to sell it back to you for a profit. Never use GoDaddy to register domains. That is my suggestion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:22:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help Jim&amp;#8230; Get His Fatblogging Domain Back!</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/help-jim-get-his-fatblogging-domain-back/#comment-4780544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it's really crazy.  The guy at &lt;a href="http://GoDaddy.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="GoDaddy.com"&gt;GoDaddy.com&lt;/a&gt;, Bob Parsons, says that the majority of domain names registered right now are handled this way.  He's actively working to ban the practice, but it's an uphill battle.  Personally, I think it's a pretty lousy practice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 23:05:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help Jim&amp;#8230; Get His Fatblogging Domain Back!</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/help-jim-get-his-fatblogging-domain-back/#comment-4780542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's Rick. I had no idea that's how they do it. Crazy stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 22:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help Jim&amp;#8230; Get His Fatblogging Domain Back!</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/help-jim-get-his-fatblogging-domain-back/#comment-4780543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've let domain names go, and they immediately get picked up by cyber squatters.  What they do is buy up the name, use the legal cancellation policy, pick it up again, etc.... they end up not paying for their names, and in the mean time they get to use it for advertising purposes.  It sucks, but it's legal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS:  Jim, if you're losing weight and want to do some blogging about it, consider joining us!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 20:50:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help Jim&amp;#8230; Get His Fatblogging Domain Back!</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/help-jim-get-his-fatblogging-domain-back/#comment-4780545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;But I want my domain back. Iâ€™m ready to go back to the gym.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Uh... are you sure you need to have your domain back before going back to the gym?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wasn't aware of this pre-requisite... ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:56:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help Jim&amp;#8230; Get His Fatblogging Domain Back!</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/help-jim-get-his-fatblogging-domain-back/#comment-4780548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My sympathies with you, Jim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A few years ago I had a domain name called "&lt;a href="http://lessbrilliant.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="lessbrilliant.co.uk"&gt;lessbrilliant.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;". I did some writing, music reviews, that kind of thing, but for one reason or another I didn't keep it up. A couple of months later I regretted not keeping the domain name so I went to re-apply for it, and it had been taken!! Who the heck would want &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://lessbrilliant.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="lessbrilliant.co.uk"&gt;lessbrilliant.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;? All the other lessbrilliants were still available, of course.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To add insult to injury it was one of those generic, hideous, and highly suspect search portals with a heavy leaning towards singles, sex and dating. Like "lessbrilliant" is a great name for &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; field!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think some people have software that scours the internet for abandoned domain names, and then snaps them up to glean the traffic that is still searching for the old site. Also, it claims it has to charge enormous administrative fees to release said name. It is altogether a frustrating and nefarious business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really hope you get the better of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rory</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:36:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help Jim&amp;#8230; Get His Fatblogging Domain Back!</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/help-jim-get-his-fatblogging-domain-back/#comment-4780547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does a bump count as hlep? Bumped!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:33:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>