<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jim Kukral - Latest Comments in Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://jimkukral.disqus.com/</link><description>Web marketing podcasts</description><atom:link href="https://jimkukral.disqus.com/google_pagerank_penalties_a_textlinkads_killer/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:55:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i wan o put TLA into my blog post but scare that G.. will drop my page rank...&lt;br&gt;somebody suggest me to use ads switcher but i feel not convenient..i wan to use Google ads and text link ads at the same time...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;do u thnink is it a good idea ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;imDavidLees last blog post..&lt;a href="http://dave-corner.blogspot.com/2008/01/daves-corner-have-been-migrated.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dave-corner.blogspot.com/2008/01/daves-corner-have-been-migrated.html"&gt;Dave's Corner Had Been Migrated !!!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">imDavidLee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My blog had been at pagerank 5 for months, and in that time the number of inbound links to the site from blogs and other credible sources increased nearly threefold.  However, I used TextLinkAds on my site, so Google has dropped my pagerank to 3!  I haven't noticed a drop in traffic yet, but this is outrageous.      Somebody needs to stop the Google monster.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK so the higher your Google PageRank the higher TLA will charge for links on your site.  Google changed their algorithm,  TLA can do the same with their algorithm.  TLA doesn't want you to make any less than what you already are.  How much you make is directly related to how much they make. Does this all make sense?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for traffic from Google.  Well, I just consider that bonus anyway since most of my traffic comes from other blogs and social news sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:52:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anne,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your &lt;a href="http://texas-sweetie.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="texas-sweetie.blogspot.com"&gt;texas-sweetie.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt; site is still PR2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The weird thing about mine (&lt;a href="http://crisisandmanagement.com/blog)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="crisisandmanagement.com/blog)"&gt;crisisandmanagement.com/blog)&lt;/a&gt; is it dropped to PR1 from PR2 about ten days ago, and today, climbed back to PR2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My other blog, &lt;a href="http://celebritybrands.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="celebritybrands.net"&gt;celebritybrands.net&lt;/a&gt; was PR3 since the last update (Apr 27, 2007) and today it's PR4 (and I didn't even do anything to raise the PR.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And &lt;a href="http://washingtonpost.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="washingtonpost.com"&gt;washingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt; drops from PR7 to PR5? As well as some top sites going down two ranks? Including &lt;a href="http://forbes.com?" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="forbes.com?"&gt;forbes.com?&lt;/a&gt; Is &lt;a href="http://forbes.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="forbes.com"&gt;forbes.com&lt;/a&gt; interested in selling back links? Don't make sense! Something wrong with Google's algoriths???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dusty Fog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;so this is it.for the whole night i kept wondering why in the world my PR went down to 1 instead of 2. now i know the reason why.trying to get rid of those link ads now and hope it goes up again as it is so hard for me to get some opps on ppp&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:38:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After going patiently through AB's blog and all the comments on it, I find your stand quite refreshing for being so different. I personally believe, nay hope, that Google will soon come out with a statement.  I don't think that they would like all the negative stuff going around in the cyberspace!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Table Pad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:12:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone says that PR of a certain amount of sites dropped down because there they sell or bought links. I believe it's a bit to easy. There are many other factors that might have been changed by google. I guess that the current drop down is rather related to many removed sites and pages. The whole discussion about the drop down is a perfect example. Someone says:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pizzafreak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:15:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how will this effect scratchback?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:31:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You really think TLA is going out of business because of this?  Patrick is a smart guy; the writing has been on the wall for a long time when it comes to having an open link purchasing marketplace.  I think TLA will survive and thrive because of this change as long as they adapt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's think basic economics - demand is as strong as ever, supply just went down, so what are prices going to do?  I'm afraid all Google is doing is pushing the market underground and making the link brokers richer in the long run.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:15:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's an interesting point, Jim, and one that I put to Patrick a couple of months ago. Sadly he decided not to respond other than saying that they had a number of initiatives in the pipeline. Now whether that means they'll be abandoning TLA and focusing on AuctionAds or Shopping Ads remains to be seen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:46:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol most likely paranoia&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's paranoia talking Vlad, or is it? Better safe than sorry eh? Deleting now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:02:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just delete your blog inside ReviewMe account, you don't know if Google is not looking in there for people to penalize.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:00:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vlad, the last time I saw that link was the day I signed up to test it out. Thanks for the trip down memory lane. I don't use that service or TLA. I did try it for a week or so (TLA) about a year ago, but it felt wrong to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:57:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pagerank Penalties A TextLinkAds Killer?</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-pagerank-penalties-a-textlinkads-killer/#comment-4781360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice going Jim&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.reviewme.com/-C/Making-Money-Online-by-Jim-Kukral-9843.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.reviewme.com/-C/Making-Money-Online-by-Jim-Kukral-9843.html"&gt;http://www.reviewme.com/-C/...&lt;/a&gt;\&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:54:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>